Trump’s Executive Orders: The Reality of Project 2025 and What They Mean for Americans

kaelynnwilkesss
Jan 21
8 min read

Okay, folks, buckle up because we’re about to dive into some executive orders from President Trump in his brand newpresidency. The man’s back at it, making moves, and while some of these may seem like a big flex, we need to talk about the real consequences for everyday people in America. Don’t worry, I’ve got you covered with all the juicy details, sprinkled with a dash of Real Housewives flair. You know, just to keep things interesting.

Let’s break it down:

1. Reinstating Military Personnel Dismissed for Vaccine Refusal

Action: President Trump decided to reinstate over 8,000 military members who were discharged for not taking the COVID vaccine. Oh, and they get back pay. Because nothing says “patriotism” like ignoring public health for your own convenience, right?

Real Housewives Analogy: Picture this: You’re at a lavish dinner party, and one housewife gets kicked out because she refuses to follow the "no carbs" rule. But lo and behold, she gets an apology and is invited back with a few bucks for the time she missed. Classic.

Potential Negative Effect: This move could send the wrong message about public health. Essentially, it’s like giving a big middle finger to the importance of vaccines, which could lead to even more health risks down the line.

Real Housewives Analogy of the Potential Negative Effect: It's like the housewife who ignored the rules, came back, and now everyone’s asking themselves, “Is it okay to break the rules if you can get away with it?” Spoiler alert: No, it’s not.

2. Deploying Troops to the U.S.-Mexico Border

Action: Trump wants to send more troops to the U.S.-Mexico border. Because apparently, deploying the military to a border doesn’t raise any red flags in a democracy, right? And don't forget, he also called Mexican cartels foreign terrorists. Charming.

Real Housewives Analogy: Imagine this: You’ve got a housewife setting up the most ridiculous amount of security around her mansion, thinking it’ll keep all the bad apples away. Is it effective? Probably not. But does it look dramatic? Absolutely.

Potential Negative Effect: This action could seriously strain relations with our neighbors, not to mention completely missing the point of addressing the root causes of migration. But hey, who needs diplomacy when you’ve got a heavy-handed military strategy?

Real Housewives Analogy of the Potential Negative Effect: It’s like putting up a fortress around your house while ignoring the fact that your neighbors might have legitimate concerns about the fence. Good luck with that.

3. Withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement

Action: Trump pulls the U.S. out of the Paris Climate Agreement. No surprise here, folks—this is one of his signature moves. He claims it's all about prioritizing American business interests over, you know, the planet.

Real Housewives Analogy: It’s like a housewife deciding to skip the annual charity ball because she’s “too busy” focusing on her own life. But here’s the catch—everyone else is keeping the environment in mind while she’s over there counting her latest shopping spree receipts.

Potential Negative Effect: This move could seriously hinder global efforts to tackle climate change and isolate the U.S. on the international stage. Because what says “global leader” better than being the only country that doesn't care about the planet?

Real Housewives Analogy of the Potential Negative Effect: It’s like skipping out on a charity event while everyone else is raising money for a good cause. Sure, you’re getting your shopping in, but your reputation? Yeah, it’s tanking.

4. Ending Birthright Citizenship

Action: Trump’s latest bright idea is to end birthright citizenship. So if you’re born in the U.S. but your parents aren’t citizens, you may not get to call yourself an American anymore.

Real Housewives Analogy: Imagine changing the family rules so that only the biological kids of the current members are allowed in the family photo. Sorry, kids born into the family by accident. You’re out.

Potential Negative Effect: This could lead to a nightmare of legal challenges and create confusion for families. Not to mention, this move could hurt children who were literally born on American soil, leaving them stuck in limbo.

Real Housewives Analogy of the Potential Negative Effect: It’s like changing the family rules mid-game and making everyone question if they’re even really part of the family. Drama alert!

5. Reversing Transgender Military Service Policies

Action: In a move that screams “we’re moving backward,” Trump has reversed policies that allowed transgender people to serve openly in the military.

Real Housewives Analogy: It’s like that one housewife who uninvites someone from the party because she’s “not comfortable” with their identity. No one knows why, but she insists it’s her “right.”

Potential Negative Effect: This could lead to outright discrimination against a group of people who have already proven their worth and dedication. So much for inclusion and equality, huh?

Real Housewives Analogy of the Potential Negative Effect: It’s like excluding someone who’s been a loyal member of the group because they don’t fit your outdated standards. Now, you’ve just created tension and a whole lot of unnecessary drama.

6. Pardoning January 6 Rioters

Action: Trump decided to give clemency to some of the people who participated in the January 6th Capitol insurrection. Yep, just a casual “my bad” to the people who tried to storm the government.

Real Housewives Analogy: It’s like the housewife who causes a scene at the party, flips a table, and then gets an apology and a welcome-back hug. Everything’s fine now, right?

Potential Negative Effect: Pardoning these individuals sends the message that violent actions have no real consequences. This could encourage further unlawful behavior and disregard for the rule of law.

Real Housewives Analogy of the Potential Negative Effect: It’s like giving a free pass to the housewife who threw the wildest tantrum ever, telling everyone it’s fine to break the rules as long as you get away with it. That’s a recipe for chaos.

7. Establishing the Department of Government Efficiency

Action: Trump created a department to, uh, make the government “more efficient,” and he’s tapped Elon Musk to lead the charge. Because when you think of government efficiency, you definitely think of the guy who created Tesla and SpaceX, right?

Real Housewives Analogy: It’s like appointing a new housewife to “organize” the group’s affairs—someone who’s all about getting the job done but might also have their own agenda.

Potential Negative Effect: This could lead to more control over government functions and possibly raise questions about whether the people in charge have their own corporate interests in mind. Spoiler alert: They probably do.

Real Housewives Analogy of the Potential Negative Effect: It’s like giving the job of managing the group to someone who already has a reputation for doing things their way. Expect a lot of personal gain and a whole lot of drama.

8. Implementing Tariffs on Imports from Canada and Mexico

Action: Trump is set to impose a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico. Because nothing screams “let’s help the economy” like starting a trade war with two of your closest neighbors.

Real Housewives Analogy: Picture a housewife charging her friends extra every time they borrow something, just because she can. After all, why not make a profit from her own circle?

Potential Negative Effect: This could lead to higher prices for consumers and tensions in trade relationships. Can’t wait to see how that pans out for your everyday shopping habits.

Real Housewives Analogy of the Potential Negative Effect: It’s like charging your friends for every little thing they borrow, causing everyone to get annoyed and stop asking for favors. The price of friendship just went up.

The Connection to Project 2025: Unpacking the Recommendations

If you’re wondering where these executive orders are coming from, look no further than Project 2025—a conservative policy agenda backed by several think tanks and organizations that are influencing the current administration's moves. This project is pushing for an overhaul of the federal government to implement more conservative principles, especially focusing on reducing regulations, limiting government intervention in the economy, and rolling back social reforms. Here’s how some of these executive orders connect to Project 2025’s recommendations:

Reinstating Military Personnel Dismissed for Vaccine Refusal Project 2025 calls for a reduction in government mandates, including COVID-19 restrictions, viewing them as an overreach of federal authority. Reinstating the military personnel who were dismissed for vaccine refusal directly aligns with this stance, as it pushes back against federal health mandates and signals a return to more personal freedom in choosing whether or not to adhere to health protocols.
Deploying Troops to the U.S.-Mexico Border The agenda also includes a strong stance on border security. Project 2025 recommends toughening immigration enforcement and securing the U.S.-Mexico border, which directly connects to the executive order deploying more military personnel to the area. This move is framed as protecting American sovereignty, pushing for stronger action against illegal immigration, and bolstering security along the southern border.
Withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement One of the core goals of Project 2025 is to bolster American energy independence and reduce dependence on international agreements that may hinder economic growth. By withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement, the administration is prioritizing U.S. economic interests over international environmental efforts, a key recommendation from Project 2025 that views climate change regulations as burdensome for American businesses.
Ending Birthright Citizenship The project includes proposals to reform immigration laws, including ending birthright citizenship for children born to non-citizens on U.S. soil. This aligns with the administration’s broader goals of curbing immigration and redefining what it means to be an American citizen in the 21st century. The executive order on birthright citizenship directly follows these lines, aiming to limit immigration and control who gets automatic citizenship, a long-standing conservative goal.
Reversing Transgender Military Service Policies Project 2025 includes recommendations to overhaul military policies to better align with conservative values, including limiting the participation of transgender individuals in the military. The order reversing policies allowing transgender people to serve openly in the military is a direct result of these recommendations, reflecting the project’s aim to reshape military priorities around what is deemed traditional and “stable” roles within armed forces.
Pardoning January 6 Rioters The pardoning of individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol insurrection can be seen as a response to the Project 2025 call for criminal justice reforms that align with conservative values. It underscores the idea of revisiting certain convictions and re-examining the consequences of actions that were seen by some as politically motivated. This action could also be seen as a message of support for those who felt their actions were justified in opposition to the 2020 election results, reflecting Project 2025’s broader goals of challenging what they view as government overreach.
Establishing the Department of Government Efficiency Project 2025 suggests reducing the size of the federal government and making it more efficient by eliminating wasteful spending and cutting back on unnecessary regulations. The creation of the Department of Government Efficiency is directly aligned with this initiative, aiming to streamline operations and improve government functioning by placing it under the control of private sector-like efficiency standards—much like Elon Musk’s business models.
Implementing Tariffs on Imports from Canada and Mexico Project 2025 advocates for rethinking U.S. trade policies to protect American industries. The imposition of tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico follows this recommendation, as it aims to encourage domestic production and reduce the reliance on foreign imports. This is in line with a broader protectionist agenda that seeks to support American businesses at the expense of international trade relations.

Conclusion

The executive orders issued so far in Trump’s new presidency are heavily influenced by the recommendations of Project 2025. Each of these actions aligns with the project’s broader vision of reducing federal oversight, pushing for stronger border security, limiting social reforms, and prioritizing economic growth over environmental concerns. While these orders are touted as solutions to what the administration sees as federal overreach, they come with significant consequences that could reshape the nation’s policies in profound ways—especially in terms of healthcare, immigration, military service, and environmental protections. Project 2025 is setting the stage for a very different approach to governance, one that is likely to have long-lasting effects on the United States and its place in the world.

Sources: